Showing posts with label feral horses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label feral horses. Show all posts

Monday, May 04, 2026

Feral horses shape their landscapes, study finds

© Carol Hancock Dreamstime.com

  

 Across Europe, many natural landscapes are undergoing rapid change. Warmer temperatures and increased
rainfall are accelerating the growth of shrubs and trees, gradually turning open habitats into dense woodland. While this process, known as ecological succession, is natural, it can threaten species that depend on light, open environments, such as wildflowers and insects. Traditionally, land managers have controlled this by cutting back vegetation. However, new research suggests that large grazing animals like horses and cattle may offer a more natural and effective solution.

This approach, known as trophic rewilding, involves introducing free-ranging herbivores into landscapes and allowing them to shape vegetation through their natural behaviour. A recent five-year study carried out in Denmark at the Mols Laboratory has provided valuable insight into how this works in practice. Researchers from Aarhus University tracked the movements of feral horses (Equus ferus caballus) and cattle (Bos taurus) across a 120-hectare rewilding site to understand how their grazing patterns influence vegetation.

Using GPS collars fitted to the animals and satellite data measuring vegetation growth (NDVI), the researchers were able to link where the animals spent their time with how the landscape changed over several years. The results showed that both horses and cattle preferred open grassland areas over dense woodland. In these frequently used areas, grazing and trampling reduced plant biomass and slowed the growth of shrubs and trees. As a result, these patches remained open for longer, supporting species that rely on sunlight and low vegetation.

However, the animals did not use the landscape evenly. Instead, they created a patchwork of heavily grazed and lightly grazed areas. This uneven grazing pattern is important because it increases habitat diversity, leading to a more varied and resilient ecosystem. Rather than maintaining a uniform landscape, the animals’ natural choices produced a dynamic mosaic of habitats.

Interestingly, the study also found that horses and cattle are not as similar as they are often assumed to be. While both species preferred similar grazing areas during times of abundance, their behaviour diverged when food became scarce. They began to use different parts of the landscape and exploit different food sources. This difference in “functional roles” is beneficial, as it enhances the overall impact on vegetation and promotes biodiversity more effectively than a single species would.

Another key finding was the influence of human-made structures. Both horses and cattle were strongly attracted to an artificial shelter within the study area, particularly the horses. This had a noticeable effect on grazing patterns, concentrating activity in specific areas. The researchers highlighted that the placement of infrastructure such as shelters or water troughs can unintentionally shape animal movement and, therefore, vegetation patterns. This is an important consideration for future rewilding projects.

The study also examined how the system responded to extreme weather, specifically the severe European drought of 2018. Areas that were heavily grazed showed the greatest decline in vegetation during the drought but also recovered the fastest afterwards. This ability to recover, known as resilience, suggests that grazing animals may help ecosystems better withstand climate extremes. However, when the herbivore population was later reduced by around two-thirds, the landscape became generally greener, indicating that the continued presence of grazing animals is essential to maintain open habitats.

Overall, the research demonstrates that year-round grazing by horses and cattle can effectively slow vegetation succession and prevent landscapes from becoming overly dense. For horse owners and equine science students, this highlights an important ecological role for horses beyond sport and recreation. When managed appropriately, horses can act as powerful agents of environmental change, contributing to biodiversity conservation and sustainable land management.

At the same time, the study emphasises that rewilding is not about leaving animals entirely  unmanaged. Animal welfare remains a priority, with populations carefully monitored to ensure that the land can support them. This balance between natural processes and responsible management is key to the success of rewilding initiatives.

In summary, horses and cattle do more than graze; they actively shape the landscapes they inhabit. By understanding their behaviour and ecological impact, we can use them to create healthier, more diverse environments in a changing world.

For more details,see:

Kristensen, Jeppe Å., Robert Buitenwerf, Emilio Berti, Oskar L. P.Hansen, Simon D.Schowanek, Rasmus Ejrnæs, Morten D. D.Hansen, Kent Olsen, Signe Normand, and Jens-Christian Svenning.

Space-Use by Feral Cattle and Horses Shapes Vegetation Structure in a Trophic Rewilding Area.”

Ecological Applications2026: 36(1): e70170

 https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.70170

 

Friday, January 23, 2026

Drones reveal how feral horse units quietly police their boundaries

Feral horses studied in this research 

 (c) Tamao Maeda

Feral horses are often admired for their apparent freedom, yet life in a wild herd involves constant negotiation. New research using drone technology has now revealed just how precisely horses manage space and social boundaries when living alongside neighbouring groups. It turns out they are far more flexible and strategic than previously understood.

Unlike territorial species that defend fixed areas, feral horses in northern Portugal live in a multilevel society. The basic social unit is a family group, typically led by a stallion with several mares and their offspring. Multiple units aggregate into larger groups, gaining protection from predators and harassment by bachelor males. However, this close proximity also brings rival stallions into frequent contact, creating the risk of costly aggression.

To understand how horses manage this trade-off, a research team led by Kyoto University observed 25 reproductive units in Serra d’Arga, Portugal. Using drones, they conducted 166  detailed aerial observations and applied statistical and spatial analyses to quantify how unit shapes and positions changed as other units approached.

The results show that spacing between units is anything but accidental. When compared with randomised models, real horse units were significantly less likely to be close to neighbouring units than expected by chance. Even when proximity increased, mixing was actively avoided, confirming that horses deliberately manage their spatial relationships to maintain social order.

Crucially, the study found that horses adjust not only where they stand, but how their group is shaped. As neighbouring units came closer, a unit would become more circular and cohesive. This likely reduces the number of individuals exposed along the edge, minimising the risk of accidental boundary crossings or confrontations. When another unit approached extremely closely, the formation changed again: the group elongated, effectively reshaping itself so that unit boundaries did not overlap.

These subtle but consistent adjustments suggest that horses maintain flexible, invisible boundaries rather than rigid territorial lines. By reshaping their group structure in response to their neighbours, they balance the benefits of aggregation with the need to avoid conflict; a sophisticated solution in a fluid social environment.

There was, however, one remarkable exception. Two units, led by stallions named Kobe and Uzumasa, repeatedly broke the rules. Unlike all other pairs, these units frequently crossed boundaries and intermixed, doing so in 21 out of 59 observations. This behaviour was not a one-off anomaly: similar interactions had been recorded as far back as 2016. No other units in this population, or in comparable studies elsewhere, have shown such high levels of mutual tolerance.

This “friendly pair” appears to represent a previously unrecognised social layer within horse multilevel societies, suggesting that long-term, unit-to-unit relationships can exist under certain conditions. Why these two stallions tolerate such close association remains unknown, but it opens new questions about alliance formation, kinship, or individual temperament in horses.

The findings offer a valuable reminder: horses are highly sensitive to space, proximity, and social context. Even in domestic settings, subtle changes in grouping, density, or layout may influence stress and behaviour more than we realise.

Overall, the study highlights that feral horses maintain harmony not through force or fixed borders, but through constant, adaptive spatial negotiation.

 

For more details, see: 

 

Spatial strategies in non-territorial societies: how feral horses maintain boundaries with other groups

Tamao Maeda; Sota Inoue; Monamie Ringhofer; Satoshi Hirata; Shinya Yamamoto  

Proc Biol Sci (2026) 293 (2063): 20252468 .

https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.2468